It’s been awhile since I’ve written. I know. Almost a year. I won’t blame it totally on the election hell results. I also tore my ACL a few months after the election, ironically, in my attempt to get outside and enjoy some nature, get my mind off stupid politics. But back to my point today. I’m here, and I want to talk about erasure and truth and an interesting experience I had writing a letter.
I’ve been thinking about erasing lately, not like pink pearl erasing (although you will soon see that kind of erasing matters too). The election and daily tweetstorm aftermath of falsehoods got me contemplating the idea of erasure and turned my mind to examine why honesty matters and why it’s sometimes so damn hard. I started thinking about how we erase people out of our lives or how people erase us out of their lives or how humans have a special knack for erasing the parts of a story that make them look bad. I’m guilty of it- we all are. We are at the dawn of a new era of “truth telling” in our country, and wanting to know what’s true is on the radar. My thinking about erasure probably started with the election but has since evolved to other areas of my life, a friend telling me that another friend wasn’t being honest, me being less afraid to say what others might find offensive, clients with partners that pathologically lie, me recently watching Ken Burn’s Vietnam War documentary (thoughts on that are for another day, but boy, did it reveal how commonplace lying and deceit on a grand scale can be), and now this. I’m back to writing, and as difficult as that can be, it feels good to be grappling with my experience of truth.
So, here’s something. I enjoy looking at old documents, stuff written before erasers, white out, and the delete button were in our everyday lexicon. For example, I like looking at edits from authors from the 19th Century. These people were writing when big changes in the editing world were taking place- publishing was much easier, distribution was faster, and writers were more visible about the way they worked and reworked pieces. Like I said, this was before the delete button. Did you know that Walt Whitman spent 40 years revising and editing and republishing Leaves of Grass? The first time I discovered his rewrites, with lines crossed through, words written in the margins with various dates, I felt a new freedom as a writer with my ever-evolving process. Emily Dickinson inspired me in a similar way. Think about all of her little scraps of poetry. She carried a pencil with her and wrote her notes and her poems with true transparency on whatever slip of paper she could find. Her treasured writings are a window into a vulnerable, powerful and uncensored mind!
But think about this. What if everything you wrote could only be done with pencil and ink? Does that make your heart beat a little faster? You would have to get more comfortable with first takes, sounding imperfect, with marking out and having your reader see your mark outs, or you would be forced to cease all written communication completely. I think the relationship to erasure and editing these writers from the past encountered were unique. We can actually track the development of their minds better than writers of today because editing was not something that could easily be disguised. It didn’t seem to matter as much either. And guess what/no surprise? We have a lot of amazing art that comes from those pre-delete days. (Side note to self: Julie, trust your first takes more.)
I decided for this essay I wanted to take a photo of me writing something in the way I used to write things – see pic above. I thought of using my Black Warrior #2 pencil, but then I kind of dreaded all the erasing I might have to do. I am an edit until the last possible second kind of gal. I had one of the first laptops in the 80s and was in awe of how easy it was to write, delete and rewrite. But to take my picture, I would not only need to write something by hand, I would have to write something meaningful to get the real feel for it. I had an important email I needed to respond to, and I kept thinking, what would it be like to write my response via letter verses email or text? So, I turned off the computer, picked up my pencil and put my thoughts to the page.
First, I actually think the overall experience was easier. Surprisingly, I think it would have taken me longer to write an email. And if I had used texting, I know the emotional weight could have been completely lost in the brevity and my overuse of happy emojis. While I did have a feeling of annoyance at having to hold my pencil and press in short strokes over and over because I don’t write by hand much, at least not letters of significance, what I noticed more was that I trusted what came out, either that or I was too lazy to make changes. But I think it was the first. I think my words came with less effort because I didn’t want to and wasn’t planning on doing a lot of erasing. I accepted what is and was and came to be as it flowed from mind to hand to paper.
The exercise made me think of this artist that I asked to do an art lesson when my son was in 4th grade. She wanted the students to focus on what she called their first art, their mark. She was fascinated by handwriting and what it revealed about a person. She separated the class based on just a few words that each child had written. I knew these kids pretty well having done art with them for the past five years and was astounded how accurate her groupings were- there were the perfectionists with their exact marks, the people pleasers with bubbly, cute marks, the introverts with tiny, lightly written marks, the extroverts with loud, heavy marks, and the weird kids that she secretly called the true artists with irregular, nonsensical marks (my kid was naturally in that group). Back in the day, I would have been in the people pleaser group. But I’ve done a lot of work on myself and my people-pleasing tendencies, and as I wrote my letter, I only stopped to erase when I misspelled a word, wrote something so messy it was illegible or at the bottom of the second page, when I was having difficulty ending the letter, I erased several times trying to close with something that didn’t seem rushed or false. That was hard. I would still like to add more balance, more qualifiers, offer a tidier, bubblier ending. Ahhh.
And that was my second realization- my closure was somewhat forced because I had actually run out of room on the paper and didn’t want to go to another page, something that doesn’t happen on email. As I neared the end of the physical margins of the paper, I began to anticipate wrapping up my thoughts and felt some relief that I didn’t have to keep explaining my side. It felt good to accept that the space was full. I was grateful for the boundary of the page. The endless amount of space email allows us doesn’t give that visual reminder that we sometimes need, that it’s okay to end.
Apparently, someone knew that an 8.5 x 11 sheet of paper is just the right amount of space. Of course, as it turns out, that magic number is no coincidence. It goes back 400 years to the wooden molds that papermakers used to form a sheet of paper. The size of the molds was based on the average length of an outstretched arm, which is 22 inches. Two out stretched arms could handle 44 inches. The finished paper would be cut into lengths of 11 inches. It was efficient and practical. Over time, the standard dimensions of most paper changed to include a width of about 8 inches to fit type set and the best spacing of words across the page. I love this real-life metaphor. The size of a sheet of paper is connected to how much a human can literally hold and read.
I won’t go much into my letter, but all to say, it was written to someone that I felt was erasing or at least heavily editing me from an important part of her narrative, and it hurt. What struck me is how common this pattern is within ourselves and each other, but usually we don’t have a witness to bring us back to, “Hey, you just erased that person and that moment completely out of your story? What’s up with that?” As a therapist, I get a little more freedom than the average person to speak to the erasures I notice. I often find myself saying some version of, “I know you aren’t talking about this, but your mother is coming to mind right now!” It seems cliché, but it can be so important to highlight erasure when we hear it.
Unquestionably, the concrete experience of writing by hand was transformative. I was able to write a difficult letter in pencil where erasing was actually so cumbersome that I only used the erase option a few times, making the entire process much less taxing and truer to what I wanted to say. Now I have to find an envelope and a stamp and wait until Monday to mail it. All of that distance eases my anxiety and makes me feel more at peace about sending it, which is a much different feeling than pushing the send button on an email or text. It’s not like either option is easy, but I’m grateful to have tried something new to keep my process more congruent to my internal reality.
So, my ending thoughts for me and for anyone still listening:
A) Don’t be a liar like our terrible President who erases and edits at free will regardless of the truth.
B) When you erase people and experiences out of a story, ask yourself why? Are you simply keeping boundaries? Are you even aware? Are you hiding something from yourself or the other person that is unflattering? Don’t be afraid to put the uncomfortable parts out there. People are much more forgiving and frankly, more interested in the messy truths of life than our polished and filtered swagger.
Oh! And,
C) Make your mark! Write a handwritten letter this week.

